The AI HR manager for Australian pest control
Hunter's HR Manager keeps the evidence, not the opinions. Complete contemporaneous time records including travel and breaks; a dated record of who you asked what to pay and what they told you; training with assessments and expiries; CPD measured against the target you recorded; and an operational scorecard per technician. It holds no award data and will never tell you what a rate should be.
Last reviewed
Replaces an HR retainer and payroll-compliance help. Employing somebody to do this work in Australia costs about $80,000* a year — which is what the figure is, not what we charge.
What the HR Manager does
A dated record of how you worked out what to pay
Hunter does not check your pay against the award. It holds no award data and never will. What it does is keep the record: who you asked, when you asked, which source they used, and what they told you — with Hunter deliberately absent from the list of sources you can pick. That dated record is what the Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code turns on, and it is the thing almost nobody keeps.
What we do not claim
The offer originally promised: A payroll audit agent checking every pay run against the Pest Control Industry Award, with continuous Fair Work monitoring. Hunter never sees a pay run, holds no award data, and never will. An operator who believes Hunter is watching their exposure and therefore stops watching it themselves is worse off than before they bought.
Start, finish, travel and breaks, captured on the job
A three-state timer in the field app: travelling, working, on a break. That typing is the difference between a timesheet and evidence — a record that says eight hours does not tell you whether the drive was paid, and a record that does not distinguish a break cannot answer the question anybody would actually ask. Exceptions are raised against the rules you entered, and where you have entered no rule Hunter raises nothing at all.
The annual wage review, and rectification when something was wrong
The annual wage review lands on the first of July. Hunter tells you it is coming and asks you to check your rates with the regulator, your accountant or your payroll provider — it states no rate and predicts no outcome, because prompting is not interpreting. When an underpayment is identified by a person, Hunter records it and tracks the back-payment through to paid. And if anybody ever asks for your time records, they are one button away, filed with the date they were produced. The word audit does not appear on any of these screens.
What we do not claim
The offer originally promised: A payroll audit agent checking every pay run against the Pest Control Industry Award, with continuous Fair Work monitoring. Hunter never sees a pay run, holds no award data, and never will. An operator who believes Hunter is watching their exposure and therefore stops watching it themselves is worse off than before they bought.
Induction and refresher training with a dated pass
Modules, lessons, multiple-choice assessments with a pass mark and an attempt limit, dated completions and a refresher expiry — so the annual one chases itself. The narrowing: Hunter ships no curriculum. There is no video hosting, no import of a training standard's packages, and no accredited content. The modules are yours, or ones the agent drafts from your own procedures, so 'pest-specific' is true of what you write rather than of anything we supply.
Something a new technician can ask on site
A new starter asks how your business does something and gets your own procedure back, on their phone, with the paragraph that answered it and a link. It answers from your published procedures and nothing else — when nothing matches it says so rather than answering from general knowledge, and a business with no written procedures gets nothing from it, which is why the procedures page leads with drafting them from your job data.
An operational scorecard per technician
Jobs completed, jobs per active day, on-time starts, callbacks and callback rate, photos per job, how often the work-done notes were filled in, chemical records finalised, hours logged. Not one of those measures whether a treatment was any good, and the page says so in its subtitle: operational measures only, not a judgement on anyone's workmanship. Hunter has no input that would let it judge a technician's work, and a number labelled quality that actually measures paperwork ends up in somebody's performance review.
Photo verification of the work that was done
Required photo contexts per service type, enforced at check-out, and coverage reported across the business — so 'did they actually do the sub-floor' is answerable from the office rather than from a phone call.
Licence and CPD renewals, escalating
Record the CPD target each technician is working to, log what they actually do, and see the gap before the renewal — measured over the period that licence's expiry defines. Every target is either something you entered or something published with a source link you supplied. A licence with no target recorded reads as 'no target recorded', which is an absence and never a pass. Hunter never states what a regulator requires.
The licensed technicians you have met, kept warm
A candidate record with licence details, a stage pipeline, and a next-touch date that re-dates itself from the stage — plus a routine that tells you who is due a hello and drafts the message. What it is not: there are no job ads, no careers page, no application forms, no resumé parsing and no job-board connection. Hunter does not find anybody. You do, and this is where you keep them so there is a bench before the vacancy.
A van that moved outside your hours
Hunter tells you when a vehicle moved outside the window you set. The source is location pings the Hunter app sent from a technician's own phone while that technician had sharing switched on — there is no hardware in the van, no dongle and no telematics integration, and the word telematics does not appear anywhere in the product. It is off by default, and off is the safe setting. Distance is straight-line between pings, not road distance, and every screen says so.
What we do not claim
The offer originally promised: GPS and telematics with after-hours vehicle movement alerts. There is no hardware in the van and no telematics integration. Claiming one is the kind of mis-sale discovered on day two.
Chemical issued against chemical applied
Issued, minus applied, minus returned, minus written off, per van and per item, over an append-only movement journal. The gap is called unaccounted and never shrinkage: stock issued on the last day of the period is still on the van, and so is a treatment that was performed and not written up — Hunter cannot tell those apart from the journal and neither can anybody else. Applications whose recorded unit does not match the item's stock unit move no stock at all rather than being guessed at, and they are listed separately and named in the note, because a variance computed against a knowingly incomplete journal is worse than no variance.
Why this role is an evidence engine and not an auditor
The offer's original version of this role promised a payroll audit agent checking every pay run against the industry award, and continuous compliance monitoring. Neither shipped, and neither will.
Hunter never sees a pay run. It holds no award data, has no payroll connection, and has no way to acquire either. Building on top of that a claim to audit award compliance would make Hunter the asserted authority for every business that bought it — and an operator who believes their software is watching their exposure, and therefore stops watching it themselves, is worse off than before they bought it. That is the same category of harm the product already refuses for chemical rates.
It is also a serious area of law. Intentional underpayment has been a criminal offence since the start of 2025, with penalties in the millions for a company, and advisers can be reached both criminally and civilly. An external payroll services provider has already been held liable for a client's underpayments in an Australian court.
So Hunter does the thing that is actually useful and actually ours to do. The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code turns on whether a failure was intentional, judged against factors including whether the employer made reasonable efforts to ascertain the correct rates, sought information from a reliable source, took steps to rectify a failure, and cooperated with an inquiry. Every one of those is a record, and Hunter keeps records.
- Complete contemporaneous time records, including travel and breaks
- A dated log of who you asked what to pay, and what they told you
- A prompt before the annual wage review — a prompt, not a rate
- Rectification tracked from identification to back-payment
- A time-records pack you can produce on demand, filed with its date
What Hunter will never say about pay
There is a short list of sentences that will not appear anywhere in this product, and the constraint is structural rather than editorial: the source list for a pay determination does not contain Hunter, and the classification source list has exactly two values, neither of which is us. Adding one would take a schema change and a failing test.
Hunter will not tell you a rate, a penalty, a loading or an allowance. It will not tell you a pay run is correct. It will not tell you that you are compliant with anything. And when the pay-rules step of setup is skipped, it seeds nothing at all rather than filling in a default — an award default would be Hunter stating a regulated fact through the back door, and a wrong one sitting quietly in a business for a year is worse than an empty field.
The exception thresholds carry the same discipline. Where a shift exception mentions a number of hours, that number is your rule, read from what you entered, and the message names your rule back to you. Where you have entered no rule, nothing is raised.
The people side, honestly scoped
Three of this role's remaining promises ship narrower than they sound, and the narrowing is on the screen in each case.
| The promise | What shipped | What did not |
|---|---|---|
| An LMS with pest-specific modules | Modules, assessments, dated passes, refresher expiries | Any curriculum from us — the content is yours or drafted from your procedures |
| A quality scorecard per technician | Operational measures: on-time starts, callbacks, photos, paperwork | Any judgement of workmanship; Hunter has no input that would support one |
| An always-on talent pool | Candidate records, a pipeline, and a nudge when somebody is due a hello | Job ads, a careers page, resumé parsing or a job-board connection |
| GPS and telematics on the vans | After-hours movement from the app on a technician's own phone, opt-in | Any hardware in the vehicle, or any telematics integration |
| Chemical issued versus applied | The arithmetic over an append-only journal, per van and item | Any claim that the gap is loss; some of it is simply still on the van |
Common questions
- Does Hunter check my pay rates against the award?
- No. It holds no award data and never will. It records who you asked what to pay, when, from which source, and what they told you — the dated evidence the small business wage compliance code turns on, and the thing almost nobody keeps. What the award requires is a question for the regulator, your accountant or your payroll provider.
- Is this GPS tracking for my vans?
- No. It is movement recorded by the Hunter app on a technician's own phone, while that technician has location sharing switched on, and it is off by default. There is no hardware in the vehicle and no telematics connection. A van whose driver never turns sharing on shows as zero, with a note explaining why.
- Does the technician scorecard measure quality of work?
- No, and the page says so above the numbers. It measures operational things — on-time starts, callbacks and callback rate, photos per job, how often notes were filled in, chemical records finalised. Hunter has no input that would let it judge workmanship, and calling paperwork completeness a quality score is how a number ends up in a performance review it should never have reached.
- Do the training modules come with pest-control content?
- Not from us. Hunter gives you the structure — modules, lessons, assessments with a pass mark, dated completions and refresher expiries — and the content is yours, or drafted by the agent from your own written procedures. Nothing in it is accredited and it does not import training packages from another system.
Want to see this one on your own book?
We take one pest control business per postcode, so the demo starts with whether yours is open.
Book a walkthroughWho it hands work to
Apply
Run your whole business from one place
Book a walkthrough and we'll show you Hunter on your own kind of work. If it fits, we set it up with you. Your data comes across, and it stays yours.
Implementation included · No lock-in contracts · Built for NSW, VIC, QLD, WA, SA, TAS, ACT & NT